Show simple item record

dc.creatorGómez Mejía, Alberto
dc.descriptionAll schools of economic thought prior to Schumpeter did not pay attention to the processes of technological innovation which was assumed to be included in the capital-machine variable. The different approaches used from Schumpeter to the present are described, including neoclassical and evolutionary schools, which are oriented to demonstrate that there can be neither growth nor development unless there are public policies that enhance the capacity of technological innovation from the educational and business. The study of technological innovation has gone from being an exclusive subject of macroeconomic policy to an issue of entrepreneurial and multidisciplinary dominance.en-US
dc.descriptionNinguna de las escuelas del pensamiento económico de preocuparon por el proceso de la innovación tecnológica la cual se dio como incluída en la variable capital-máquina. Los diferentes enfoques desarrollados desde Schumpeter hasta la actualidad son descritos, incluyendo los de las escuelas neoclásicas y evolucionista que demustran que no puede haber ni crecimiento económico ni desarrollo a menos que se implementen políticas públicas orientadas a estimular la capacidad de la innovación tecnológica desde el sistema educativo y empresarial. El estudio de la innovación tecnológica ha dejado de ser un tema de política macroeconómica para ser tratado como elemento micro a nivel empresarial e incluso desde variados enfoques
dc.descriptionNenhuma das escolas de pensamento econômico preocupado com o processo de inovação tecnológica que foi dado como incluído na variável capital-máquina. As diferentes abordagens desenvolvidas de Schumpeter ao presente são descritas, incluindo as das escolas neoclássicas e evolucionistas que demonstram que não pode haver crescimento econômico nem desenvolvimento a menos que políticas públicas sejam implementadas para estimular a capacidade de inovação tecnológica do sistema educacional e empresarial O estudo da inovação tecnológica deixou de ser um tema de política macroeconômica a ser tratado como um micro elemento ao nível dos negócios e mesmo de várias abordagens
dc.publisherUniversidad Librees-ES
dc.relation/*ref*/Allen, F. & Douglas, G. (1999). “Diversity of opinion and financing of new technologies”. European Economic Review, 39, 179-209.
dc.relation/*ref*/Allen, F. & Yago, G. (2010). Financing the Future. Market-based innovations for growth. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Milken Institute.
dc.relation/*ref*/Andersen, E. S. (1994). Evolutionary Economics, Post-Schumpeterian Contributions. London: Pinter
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2001, June 12-15). Towards a Multiactivity Generalisation of the Nelson-Winter Model. Conference presented at the 2001 Nelson-Winter Conference, organized by DRUID, Aalborg, Denmark.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2004). “Population thinking, Price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution”. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1, 127–148.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2004, June). From Schumpeter´s failed econometrics to modern evometric analysis: Creative destruction as a tale of two effects. Conference presented at the International Schumpeter Society. Bocconi University, Milán. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Bhagat, S. & Welch, I. (1995). “Corporate Research and Development Investments: International Comparisons,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 19, 443-470. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Blass, A. & Yosha, O. (2001). “Financing R&D in Mature Companies: An Empirical Analysis”, Working Paper Series STE-WP-10. Bank of Israel, Tel Aviv University, and CEPR. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2008). The Management of technological innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Elliot, J. S. (1980). “Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism’s Creative Destruction”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 45-68.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fagerberg, J. (2002). “A Layman’s Guide to Evolutionary Economics”. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Fagerberg, J. & Verspagen, B. (2007).“Innovation, growth and economic development: have the conditions for catch-up changed?”. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1, 13-33.
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, C. (1974). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, C. & Pérez, C. (1988). Structural Crises of Adjustment: business Cycles and Investment Behavior, pp. 38-66. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg y l. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, C. & Louca, F. (2001). As Time goes by. From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, C. (2005). “The National System of Innovation in historical perspective”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-24.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gómez-Mejía A. (2017). “Financing Technological Innovation in Global Capital Markets. 2009-2016”.To be published by Revista Libre Empresa, Universidad Libre, Cali, Colombia
dc.relation/*ref*/Hodgson, G. M. (1997). Economics and Evolution, pp. 9-40. In Jan Reijnders (ed.). Cheltenham: Elgar.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(1998). On the evolution of Thornstein Veblen´s evolutionay economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, 415-431
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2002).“Darwinism in Economics: From analogy to ontology”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 259-281.
dc.relation/*ref*/Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Landes, D. S. (1999). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: W.W.Norton and company.
dc.relation/*ref*/Leontief, W. (1953). “Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examine”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. September, pp. 332-49.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lucas, R. E, (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lundvall, B.A. & Johnson, B. (1994). “The learning economy”. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.
dc.relation/*ref*/Marshall, A. (1890, printed in 1920). Principles of Economics. Eigth edition. London: Macmillan and Company Ltd.
dc.relation/*ref*/Marx, K. (2015, printed in 1887). Capital A Critique of Political Economy. The Process of Production of Capital. 1(1). Retrieved from works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Mumford, L. (1992). Técnica y Civilización. Quinta reimpresión. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
dc.relation/*ref*/Murmann, J, P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage. The coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/OECD. (2009). Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2010), High-Growth Enterprises: What Governments Can Do to Make a Difference, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from en Agosto 21, 2015.
dc.relation/*ref*/Pavitt, K. (1984).“Sectorial patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory”. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373.
dc.relation/*ref*/Pérez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. London: Edward Elgar Editorial.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2005). Revoluciones Tecnológicas y Capital Financiero: La dinámica de las Grandes Burbujas Financieras y las Épocas de Bonanza. México: Siglo XXI.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(2010). “A view of technical change with the aid of History”. Technological University of Tallinn, Estonia. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Possas, M. L. (2005). “A Multisectoral Micro-Macrodynamic Model”. Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Economia. Retrieved from http://www. texto_08.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Roll, E. (1994). Historia de las doctrinas económicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
dc.relation/*ref*/Romer, Paul M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ross, S., Westerfield, R. & Jordan, B. (2001). Fundamentos de Finanzas Corporativas. México: McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ruttan, V. W. (2006). “Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development”. University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics, Staff Papers, pp. 06-14. Retrieved from
dc.relation/*ref*/Smith, A. (1977) [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(1939). Business Cycle. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper Editorial
dc.relation/*ref*/_(1947). The creative response in economic history, Schumpeter (1989), 221–231.
dc.relation/*ref*/_(1954). History of Economic Analysis . London: Allen & Unwin (Publishers) Ltd
dc.relation/*ref*/Veblen, T. B. (1898a), “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?”, Quarterly, 24, 296-303. Reprinted in Veblen (1934).
dc.relation/*ref*/Vernon, R. (1966). “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
dc.relation/*ref*/Walras, L. (1877, printed in 1954). Elements of Pure Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wilson, K. E. (2015), “Policy Lessons from Financing Innovative Firms”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 24, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from
dc.sourceLibre Empresa; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2017): Libre Empresa; 199-214es-ES
dc.subjectPensamiento económicoes-ES
dc.titleEl concepto de Tecnología en la Historia del Pensamiento Económico. De los clásicos a Schumpeter, al evolucionismo de hoyen-US
dc.titleThe concept of Technology in the History of Economic Thought. From the Classics to Schumpeter, Evolutionism and todayes-ES
dc.titleO conceito de Tecnologia na História do Pensamento Econômico. Dos clássicos a Schumpeter, ao evolucionismo de hojept-BR
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as