La implementacion artificial y su implementacion en la corte constitucional de Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorCorzo, luis alejandro
dc.contributor.authorAmaya Hernández, Brian David
dc.coverage.spatialCúcutaspa
dc.creator.emailbrianamayah@hotmail.comspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T16:54:46Z
dc.date.available2025-11-24T16:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-25
dc.description.abstractEl presente artículo analiza la implementación de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la Corte Constitucional de Colombia, evaluando su impacto en la eficiencia procesal, la protección de los derechos fundamentales y los retos éticos que conlleva. Se estudian experiencias internacionales y el papel de la Corte como garante de la supremacía de la Constitución. Además, se considera el prototipo Prometea, implementado desde hace varios años para la selección de tutelas, como un ejemplo práctico de aplicación de IA en el ámbito judicial colombiano. Se concluye que la IA no debe reemplazar a los jueces, sino complementarlos, siempre bajo marcos normativos claros que eviten riesgos de sesgo, opacidad y exclusión digital (Susskind, 2019; Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, 2022).spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe present article analyzes the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Constitutional Court of Colombia, evaluating its impact on procedural efficiency, the protection of fundamental rights, and the ethical challenges it entails. It examines international experiences and the role of the Court as the guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution. In addition, it considers the Prometea prototype, implemented several years ago for the selection of tutela cases, as a practical example of AI application in the Colombian judicial system. The article concludes that AI should not replace judges but rather complement them, always within clear regulatory frameworks that prevent risks of bias, opacity, and digital exclusion (Susskind, 2019; Superior Council of the Judiciary, 2022).spa
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad libre seccional Cúcuta--Facultad Ciencia Política y Sociales -- Programa de Derechospa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/32254
dc.relation.referencesAletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93spa
dc.relation.referencesAletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93spa
dc.relation.referencesBinns, R., & Veale, M. (2022). Prometea and algorithmic justice: Lessons from AI-assisted courts. AI & Society, 37(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01312-0spa
dc.relation.referencesBinns, R., & Veale, M. (2022). Prometea and algorithmic justice: Lessons from AI-assisted courts. AI & Society, 37(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01312-0spa
dc.relation.referencesConstitución Política de Colombia. (1991). Artículo 241. Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2018). European ethical charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. CEPEJ. https://go.coe.int/mKzW7spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. (2021). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI in judicial systems. Publications Office of the European Union. https://digital strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-aispa
dc.relation.referencesFrankel, M. (2022). Ethics of artificial intelligence in the judiciary. Journal of Law & Technology, 14(2), 45–67spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision making and a “right to explanation.” AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H., Lin, Z., & Chen, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in courts: Comparative perspectives from China and Europe. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105562spa
dc.relation.referencesMargetts, H., & Dorobantu, C. (2021). Governing artificial intelligence in the public sector: Cases from judicial systems. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101583spa
dc.relation.referencesPaliwala, A. (2020). The digitalisation of justice and the future of the rule of law. Law in Context, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26826/law-in-context.v37i1.146spa
dc.relation.referencesRai, A., & Danks, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence and legal decision-making: Ensuring fairness and accountability. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723456spa
dc.relation.referencesSusskind, R. (2019). Tomorrow’s lawyers: An introduction to your future (2nd ed.). Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesUniversidad de los Andes. (2020). Prometea: Inteligencia artificial para la predicción de decisiones judiciales en Colombia. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de los Andes. https://derecho.uniandes.edu.co/prometeaspa
dc.relation.referencesUprimny, R. (2011). La acción de tutela y el sistema judicial colombiano. Revista Derecho del E Cappuccio, M. L., & Sandoval, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the rule of law: New challenges for constitutional courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(3), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac025spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/spa
dc.subjectInteligencia artificial, Corte Constitucional, justicia digital, ética judicial, acceso a la justicia, Prometea.spa
dc.subject.lembInteligencia artificial--- Aspectos Júridicosspa
dc.subject.subjectenglishArtificial intelligence, Constitutional Court, digital justice, judicial ethics, access to justice, Prometea.spa
dc.titleLa implementacion artificial y su implementacion en la corte constitucional de Colombiaspa
dc.title.alternativeArtificial implementation and its implementation in the Constitutional Court of Colombiaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesis de Pregradospa

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RESUMEN DEL ESCRITO (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1).pdf
Size:
101.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
RESUMEN
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
articulo Brian Amaya. 2025.pdf
Size:
335.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo principal
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CamScanner 21-11-2025 17.33.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
AUTORIZACION FIRMA Y HUELLA
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ACTA DE GRADA.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
ACTA

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections