La implementacion artificial y su implementacion en la corte constitucional de Colombia
| dc.contributor.advisor | Corzo, luis alejandro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amaya Hernández, Brian David | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Cúcuta | spa |
| dc.creator.email | brianamayah@hotmail.com | spa |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-24T16:54:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-24T16:54:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-25 | |
| dc.description.abstract | El presente artículo analiza la implementación de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la Corte Constitucional de Colombia, evaluando su impacto en la eficiencia procesal, la protección de los derechos fundamentales y los retos éticos que conlleva. Se estudian experiencias internacionales y el papel de la Corte como garante de la supremacía de la Constitución. Además, se considera el prototipo Prometea, implementado desde hace varios años para la selección de tutelas, como un ejemplo práctico de aplicación de IA en el ámbito judicial colombiano. Se concluye que la IA no debe reemplazar a los jueces, sino complementarlos, siempre bajo marcos normativos claros que eviten riesgos de sesgo, opacidad y exclusión digital (Susskind, 2019; Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, 2022). | spa |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | The present article analyzes the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Constitutional Court of Colombia, evaluating its impact on procedural efficiency, the protection of fundamental rights, and the ethical challenges it entails. It examines international experiences and the role of the Court as the guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution. In addition, it considers the Prometea prototype, implemented several years ago for the selection of tutela cases, as a practical example of AI application in the Colombian judicial system. The article concludes that AI should not replace judges but rather complement them, always within clear regulatory frameworks that prevent risks of bias, opacity, and digital exclusion (Susskind, 2019; Superior Council of the Judiciary, 2022). | spa |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad libre seccional Cúcuta--Facultad Ciencia Política y Sociales -- Programa de Derecho | spa |
| dc.format | spa | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10901/32254 | |
| dc.relation.references | Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Binns, R., & Veale, M. (2022). Prometea and algorithmic justice: Lessons from AI-assisted courts. AI & Society, 37(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01312-0 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Binns, R., & Veale, M. (2022). Prometea and algorithmic justice: Lessons from AI-assisted courts. AI & Society, 37(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01312-0 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Constitución Política de Colombia. (1991). Artículo 241. Colombia. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Council of Europe. (2018). European ethical charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. CEPEJ. https://go.coe.int/mKzW7 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | European Commission. (2021). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI in judicial systems. Publications Office of the European Union. https://digital strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Frankel, M. (2022). Ethics of artificial intelligence in the judiciary. Journal of Law & Technology, 14(2), 45–67 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision making and a “right to explanation.” AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Liu, H., Lin, Z., & Chen, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in courts: Comparative perspectives from China and Europe. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105562 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Margetts, H., & Dorobantu, C. (2021). Governing artificial intelligence in the public sector: Cases from judicial systems. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101583 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Paliwala, A. (2020). The digitalisation of justice and the future of the rule of law. Law in Context, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26826/law-in-context.v37i1.146 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Rai, A., & Danks, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence and legal decision-making: Ensuring fairness and accountability. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723456 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Susskind, R. (2019). Tomorrow’s lawyers: An introduction to your future (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Universidad de los Andes. (2020). Prometea: Inteligencia artificial para la predicción de decisiones judiciales en Colombia. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de los Andes. https://derecho.uniandes.edu.co/prometea | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Uprimny, R. (2011). La acción de tutela y el sistema judicial colombiano. Revista Derecho del E Cappuccio, M. L., & Sandoval, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the rule of law: New challenges for constitutional courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(3), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac025 | spa |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | spa |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec | spa |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | spa |
| dc.subject | Inteligencia artificial, Corte Constitucional, justicia digital, ética judicial, acceso a la justicia, Prometea. | spa |
| dc.subject.lemb | Inteligencia artificial--- Aspectos Júridicos | spa |
| dc.subject.subjectenglish | Artificial intelligence, Constitutional Court, digital justice, judicial ethics, access to justice, Prometea. | spa |
| dc.title | La implementacion artificial y su implementacion en la corte constitucional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.title.alternative | Artificial implementation and its implementation in the Constitutional Court of Colombia | spa |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | spa |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | spa |
| dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | spa |
| dc.type.local | Tesis de Pregrado | spa |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
- Name:
- RESUMEN DEL ESCRITO (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1).pdf
- Size:
- 101.71 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- RESUMEN
Loading...
- Name:
- articulo Brian Amaya. 2025.pdf
- Size:
- 335.05 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Artículo principal
Loading...
- Name:
- CamScanner 21-11-2025 17.33.pdf
- Size:
- 1.16 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- AUTORIZACION FIRMA Y HUELLA
Loading...
- Name:
- ACTA DE GRADA.pdf
- Size:
- 1.06 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- ACTA
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
